Congress Sounds Alarm Over “Staggering” California Fraud Scheme
NEWSOM’S CRISIS: LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMERGES AS GROUND ZERO FOR ORGANIZED CRIME AND HOSPICE FRAUD

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A sweeping push for accountability has now turned its focus toward California under Governor Gavin Newsom.
In a high-impact joint letter dated January 13, 2026, a group of senior House Republican chairmen called for an immediate meeting with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), raising alarm over what they describe as “widespread, ongoing Medicare fraud.”
According to the lawmakers, the scheme has transformed Los Angeles County into a sprawling “paper empire,” where fraudulent hospice operations and organized criminal networks allegedly exploit federal healthcare funds on a massive scale.
The investigation, led by Chairmen Jason Smith, Brett Guthrie, and Morgan Griffith, has uncovered a staggering reality: Los Angeles County now accounts for a massive 18 percent of all home health billing in the entire United States.
This is despite the county representing only a tiny fraction of the nation’s senior population. The data suggests that California’s largest county has been transformed into a playground for "criminal enterprises" and Armenian organized crime groups, who are looting the American treasury at light speed.
The scale of the "staggering" fraud is unprecedented. L.A. County currently hosts nearly 2,000 hospice agencies—more than 36 states combined and 30 times more than Florida or New York.
In one "brazen" instance, a single physician allegedly billed the federal government a shocking $120 million in one year while claiming to supervise 1,900 patients. This level of theft is a direct indictment of the "asleep at the switch" governance that has defined the radical Left’s control over California.

THE "STRIP MALL" HOSPICE: EXPOSING SYSTEMIC FEDERAL NEGLIGENCE AND "RUBBER-STAMPING"
The House Ways and Means Committee has revealed that many of these so-called medical agencies are operating out of strip malls, unmarked buildings, and even wrecking yards. A 2022 state audit shockingly found that more than 112 hospice agencies were registered to a single physical address in Los Angeles County. Despite these clear red flags, federal accrediting organizations have continued to "rubber-stamp" Medicare enrollment applications without verifying legitimate patient activity.
"How is that possible?" Chairman Jason Smith asked in a defiant statement. "It’s an entire paper empire draining taxpayer dollars that should go to real care." While home health agencies have declined by six percent nationally over the past five years, L.A. County has seen an explosive 46 percent increase since 2019. More than 1,400 new agencies have registered in the county alone, accounting for 14 percent of the entire national total.
The 119th Congress is moving at light speed to reclaim the stolen funds. Federal auditors estimate that hospice and home health fraud cost the American taxpayer at least $1.4 billion in fiscal year 2023 alone. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has finally labeled the sector as "high risk," but lawmakers argue that enforcement has lagged dangerously behind under the previous administration’s failed policies.
ORGANIZED CRIME AND THE 2026 MANDATE: TRUMP’S WAR ON HEALTH-CARE THEFT
The investigation has also highlighted the involvement of Armenian organized crime groups, who have allegedly laundered tens of millions through fake hospice operations. The Health Care Fraud Strike Force dismantled five such networks in 2025, but the problem remains widespread across the greater Los Angeles area. President Donald Trump’s mandate for "Law and Order" is now being extended to the very heart of the federal health-care apparatus.
Chairman Guthrie has vowed to use the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s subpoena power if federal agencies fail to deliver clear answers. The goal is simple: secure the treasury and ensure that every fraudulent claim is stopped. "Every fraudulent claim is a dollar stolen from a senior who needs real care," said Chairman Vern Buchanan. The coordination between the House Oversight Subcommittee and the HHS OIG signals a new era of transparency that Newsom’s California has desperately lacked.
The reckoning for this systemic negligence is here. While Governor Gavin Newsom remains focused on radical "woke" priorities, the Trump-GOP platform is focused on protecting the American worker and the national treasury. The 2026 midterm shield is being forged by the truth, and the investigation into California’s billion-dollar theft is a vital part of reclaiming our house and our sovereignty.
SECURING THE FUTURE: THE FINAL VERDICT ON CALIFORNIA’S FRAUD CRISIS
The final verdict on the California fraud scheme is one of unprecedented corruption and administrative failure. By allowing "ghost" providers and criminal syndicates to loot the Medicare system, the previous regime betrayed the trust of every American citizen. The 119th Congress remains committed to a simple, secure, and transparent government where the law is followed and the criminals are hauled to justice.
As the House continues to schedule hearings on what members call "systemic federal negligence," the contrast between the party of Security and the party of Chaos has never been clearer. We will not let the radical Left distract us with their "word salad" excuses. We will hold them accountable, we will secure our funds, and we will make America’s health-care system honest and great again.
God bless the USA and the leaders who refuse to be intimidated by the mob. The 2026 mandate is being fulfilled by the truth, and the investigation into L.A. County is the light that will guide us to a secure future. From the border to the billing office, the Trump-GOP agenda is delivering the results the American people demanded. The "paper empire" is falling, and real justice is being served in broad daylight.
Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Contains Financial Surprise For Seniors
Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Contains Financial Surprise For Seniors

The tax law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, includes a new temporary tax deduction aimed at taxpayers age 65 and older that could reduce their federal tax burden on filings for tax years 2025 through 2028.
Under the provision, eligible seniors may claim up to a $6,000 additional deduction on their federal income tax returns, on top of the regular standard deduction or any itemized deductions. Married couples in which both spouses are 65 or older may qualify for up to $12,000 in total senior deductions.
To qualify, taxpayers must be 65 or older by the end of the tax year and have a valid Social Security number. There are income limits for full eligibility: single filers generally must have a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below about $75,000, and married joint filers must have a MAGI below about $150,000. The deduction phases out gradually for incomes above those thresholds and is unavailable once income exceeds the higher limits.
The deduction is available whether a senior itemizes deductions or takes the standard deduction, and its primary effect is to lower taxable income, which can reduce tax liability or increase a tax refund when filing. It does not directly eliminate federal tax on Social Security benefits, though in many cases the deduction may reduce tax owed on part of those benefits, Moneywise reported.
The senior tax break is one of several individual tax provisions in the 2025 law, which also extended prior tax cuts and added other deductions for things like wage income and interest expenses.

One of the most compelling reasons to claim this deduction is the rising cost of health care
By 2026, Medicare Part B premiums and other cost-sharing requirements continue to climb, often reducing a significant portion of the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) increase. For many seniors, these recurring medical expenses are a major drain on their retirement savings, the outlet reported.
By utilizing the $6,000 deduction to lower your federal tax liability, you can effectively increase your available funds for covering these premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs, without depleting your principal savings further.
It’s important to note that the benefit of this deduction largely depends on whether you owe federal income tax. Many lower-income seniors may have zero tax liability after applying the standard deduction. For them, an additional deduction offers no extra benefit since it is not a refundable credit.

The ideal candidates for this deduction are retirees who have enough taxable income—whether from IRA withdrawals, pensions, wages, or investments—such that a $6,000 reduction in taxable income leads to actual tax savings, the report added.|
One of the most flexible aspects of this new law is that it is available to both itemizers and non-itemizers. This means you don’t have to choose between your charitable giving or medical expense deductions and the new $6,000 deduction. However, it’s important to run the numbers to determine whether itemizing is more beneficial than taking the standard deduction, particularly if you have significant state and local taxes or mortgage interest.
Timing is also crucial for maximizing this benefit. Between now and 2028, consider strategically managing your Individual Retirement Account (IRA) withdrawals or exploring Roth conversions to make the most of the deduction while staying below the phaseout thresholds.
“When doing so, always keep an eye on your provisional income to avoid accidentally triggering higher taxes on your Social Security or higher Medicare IRMAA (income-related monthly adjustment amount) surcharges,” Moneywise noted further.
“Whether you prepare your own taxes or work with a professional, double-check that the deduction is applied correctly, especially on joint returns, to ensure you are capturing the full $12,000 for a married couple,” said the report.
A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington
A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington
Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge.
The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.

Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices. In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers.
The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.

Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge. The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.
Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices. In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers. The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.

Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge.
The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.
Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices.
In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers. The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.