Trump Urges Fox News to Remove Two Key On-Air Personalities
Trump Urges Fox News to Remove Two Key On-Air Personalities
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump criticized two Fox News personalities in a Truth Social post aimed at the network’s leadership, following a recent “Fox News Sunday” interview with Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss of Massachusetts.
Trump took issue with anchor Shannon Bream, accusing her of failing to challenge what he described as “propaganda and false claims” from Democratic guests. He also targeted Jessica Tarlov, a liberal panelist on “The Five,” urging Fox executives to remove her from the network.
In his statement, Trump argued that Bream should correct misleading remarks during interviews and suggested her program lacks strong pushback. He also reiterated his belief that his administration achieved more than Democrats, particularly in foreign policy matters such as relations with China.
Trump’s criticism of Tarlov was more personal, claiming she misrepresents polling data and is unpopular with viewers. Despite the criticism, he added that she may be “a lovely person.”
During the Fox interview, Auchincloss described the conflict with Iran as a “failure” and claimed Iran had gained leverage through control of the Strait of Hormuz — assertions disputed by Trump and his allies.
Trump also renewed his attacks on CNN, accusing the network of spreading misinformation after it reported on a statement attributed to Iran claiming victory and a 10-point ceasefire agreement. The report, based on Iranian state media, suggested the U.S. had agreed to lift sanctions, withdraw troops, and accept Iran’s nuclear program.
Trump rejected the report as “fraudulent,” alleging it originated from an unreliable source and was improperly presented as legitimate news. He added that authorities are reviewing whether any wrongdoing occurred in the dissemination of the report.
Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Contains Financial Surprise For Seniors
Trump’s ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ Contains Financial Surprise For Seniors
The tax law known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4, 2025, includes a new temporary tax deduction aimed at taxpayers age 65 and older that could reduce their federal tax burden on filings for tax years 2025 through 2028.
Under the provision, eligible seniors may claim up to a $6,000 additional deduction on their federal income tax returns, on top of the regular standard deduction or any itemized deductions. Married couples in which both spouses are 65 or older may qualify for up to $12,000 in total senior deductions.
To qualify, taxpayers must be 65 or older by the end of the tax year and have a valid Social Security number. There are income limits for full eligibility: single filers generally must have a modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) below about $75,000, and married joint filers must have a MAGI below about $150,000. The deduction phases out gradually for incomes above those thresholds and is unavailable once income exceeds the higher limits.
The deduction is available whether a senior itemizes deductions or takes the standard deduction, and its primary effect is to lower taxable income, which can reduce tax liability or increase a tax refund when filing. It does not directly eliminate federal tax on Social Security benefits, though in many cases the deduction may reduce tax owed on part of those benefits, Moneywise reported.
The senior tax break is one of several individual tax provisions in the 2025 law, which also extended prior tax cuts and added other deductions for things like wage income and interest expenses.
One of the most compelling reasons to claim this deduction is the rising cost of health care
By 2026, Medicare Part B premiums and other cost-sharing requirements continue to climb, often reducing a significant portion of the annual cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) increase. For many seniors, these recurring medical expenses are a major drain on their retirement savings, the outlet reported.
By utilizing the $6,000 deduction to lower your federal tax liability, you can effectively increase your available funds for covering these premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs, without depleting your principal savings further.
It’s important to note that the benefit of this deduction largely depends on whether you owe federal income tax. Many lower-income seniors may have zero tax liability after applying the standard deduction. For them, an additional deduction offers no extra benefit since it is not a refundable credit.
The ideal candidates for this deduction are retirees who have enough taxable income—whether from IRA withdrawals, pensions, wages, or investments—such that a $6,000 reduction in taxable income leads to actual tax savings, the report added.|
One of the most flexible aspects of this new law is that it is available to both itemizers and non-itemizers. This means you don’t have to choose between your charitable giving or medical expense deductions and the new $6,000 deduction. However, it’s important to run the numbers to determine whether itemizing is more beneficial than taking the standard deduction, particularly if you have significant state and local taxes or mortgage interest.
Timing is also crucial for maximizing this benefit. Between now and 2028, consider strategically managing your Individual Retirement Account (IRA) withdrawals or exploring Roth conversions to make the most of the deduction while staying below the phaseout thresholds.
“When doing so, always keep an eye on your provisional income to avoid accidentally triggering higher taxes on your Social Security or higher Medicare IRMAA (income-related monthly adjustment amount) surcharges,” Moneywise noted further.
“Whether you prepare your own taxes or work with a professional, double-check that the deduction is applied correctly, especially on joint returns, to ensure you are capturing the full $12,000 for a married couple,” said the report.
A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington
A Reflective Moment From Donald Trump in Washington
Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge.
The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.
Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices. In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers.
The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.
Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge. The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.
Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices. In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers. The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.
Away from the roar of rallies and the sharp edges of televised clashes, the former president’s silence in that Washington room carried an unexpected charge.
The absence of performance revealed a different kind of presence—one defined less by dominance than by the gravity of memory, consequence, and possibility. For a few suspended moments, the usual choreography of power gave way to something unnervingly human.
Those watching weren’t looking at a headline, a poll number, or a caricature. They were watching a person who has altered the country’s trajectory sit with the invisible cost of those choices.
In that stillness, leadership looked less like certainty and more like the burden of knowing there are no easy answers. The city moved on, as it always does, but for those who witnessed it, that quiet pause said more than any speech.
Melania Trump admits that she tested positive for…See more 1
Melania Trump admits that she tested positive for…See more
PALM BEACH, FLORIDA — Former First Lady Melania Trump is once again drawing widespread public attention after a personal update connected to her name began circulating online, leaving supporters and social media users speculating about what may be going on behind the scenes.
The viral headline quickly gained traction across Facebook, X, and other social platforms, where thousands of users shared emotional reactions and asked for clarity. Although the wording offered little immediate detail, that ambiguity appeared to be exactly what made the story spread so rapidly.
Within hours, Melania Trump’s name had become the center of a broader online conversation, with many people expressing concern, curiosity, and a desire to understand the full context behind the headline.
For a figure like Melania Trump — someone who has maintained both high visibility and striking privacy — even a small or vague update can quickly turn into a major public story.
That tension between mystery and fame has long defined her public image.
Unlike many political spouses who remain constantly present in the media, Melania has often taken a quieter, more controlled approach to public life. Throughout her years in the White House and beyond, she has remained a figure who attracts enormous attention while revealing relatively little of her personal world.
That reserved style has only deepened public fascination.
Whenever her name appears in a dramatic or emotionally framed headline, audiences tend to react quickly — not only because of who she is, but because people feel they know so little about what she is truly thinking or experiencing.
That appears to be exactly what happened this time.
Social media users immediately began speculating about the meaning behind the viral wording. Some assumed the update might involve health, family, or a private personal matter. Others suggested it could simply be another case of a vague internet headline designed to trigger concern without providing real context.
Either way, the emotional reaction was immediate.
“I really hope she’s okay,” one user commented beneath a widely shared post. “Melania is always so private that any headline like this instantly feels serious.”
Another wrote, “You never really know what’s going on with her because she stays out of the spotlight so much. That’s why people react so strongly.”
That reaction says a great deal about Melania Trump’s unusual place in American public life.
She remains one of the most recognizable women in the country, yet also one of the least publicly accessible. Her image is familiar to millions, but her inner life remains largely shielded. In an age of constant oversharing, that kind of distance has become both rare and intriguing.
As a result, public curiosity about her has remained intense even after her time in the White House.
Whether appearing at formal events, being photographed in rare public moments, or simply being mentioned in connection with the Trump family, Melania often generates attention disproportionate to how often she actually speaks or appears.
That is a powerful kind of visibility — one built not on constant presence, but on selective appearances and public mystery.
Media analysts say this kind of figure is especially vulnerable to viral speculation in the digital age. Because the public has so little routine access to her thoughts or personal updates, even a small hint of something serious can quickly trigger major interest.
In many ways, the internet fills in the silence.
That silence has often shaped how Melania is perceived. Supporters view her as graceful, composed, and dignified. Critics sometimes interpret her distance differently. But across both camps, there is a shared recognition that she remains a uniquely compelling public figure — someone whose minimal words often generate maximal discussion.
That dynamic helps explain why this latest headline spread so quickly.
At the same time, the story has also sparked criticism of the way emotionally loaded content is often packaged online. Many users pointed out that headlines built around suspense and omission can create unnecessary anxiety, especially when they involve well-known public figures.
“It’s exhausting,” one commenter wrote. “These headlines are made to make people panic before they even know what the story is.”
Others echoed that frustration, saying that internet culture increasingly rewards emotional bait over factual clarity. In stories involving people like Melania Trump, that can create a distorted picture long before any real information is available.
Still, amid the confusion, one thing became very clear: people remain deeply interested in Melania Trump.
That interest goes beyond politics alone.
For some, she represents elegance and restraint in a chaotic media age. For others, she remains a symbol of one of the most unusual chapters in recent American political history. And for many, she simply continues to be someone whose life feels partly hidden — which makes every update seem larger than it might otherwise be.
That fascination has not faded.
If anything, her lower public profile in recent years may have made her even more compelling to the public imagination. The less she says, the more people speculate. The fewer appearances she makes, the more attention each one receives.
And when a headline suddenly suggests something personal or concerning, the reaction becomes almost inevitable.
Supporters continued to flood social media with messages of encouragement, while others called for patience and restraint until clearer details emerge. That more measured response has helped temper some of the speculation, but it has not slowed public curiosity.
For now, much of the conversation remains focused on concern, mystery, and the emotional pull of uncertainty.
Whatever the full context behind the viral headline may ultimately be, the reaction itself has already revealed something significant: Melania Trump still commands extraordinary attention in American culture.
And she does so not by saying more — but often by saying less.
That is a rare kind of influence.
In today’s media landscape, where visibility is usually driven by constant output, Melania’s continued relevance is built on something quieter but no less powerful: absence, intrigue, and the public’s enduring desire to understand what remains unsaid.
Until more context becomes available, the discussion is likely to continue.
And for now, supporters, critics, and curious observers all seem to agree on one thing — whenever Melania Trump’s name appears in a headline like this, America notices.
