Trump Ally Pledges Major CNN Changes if Paramount Wins Warner Bros. Takeover
A major political and corporate showdown is unfolding around the future of American media, with billionaire technology entrepreneur Larry Ellison and his son David Ellison playing a central role.
At the heart of the drama is the future of CNN and a potential reshaping of the U.S. media landscape.
Sources familiar with the situation say the Ellisons have privately reassured Donald Trump that if their company, Paramount Global, successfully completes its proposed $108 billion hostile takeover of Warner Bros.
Discovery, they would carry out sweeping changes at CNN—an outlet Trump has frequently criticized and labeled as “fake news.”
The Paramount bid emerged shortly after Netflix announced a $72 billion agreement to acquire Warner’s film studio and HBO operations. Under Netflix’s structure, however, CNN would not be included and would instead be spun off as a separate entity.
Paramount’s proposal takes a different approach. The Ellisons’ offer specifically includes CNN, and insiders say they plan to dramatically transform the network if the deal goes through.
According to reports, during private discussions in Washington, David Ellison told senior officials aligned with Trump that CNN would face a “fundamental cultural and editorial transformation” under Paramount ownership. His father, Larry Ellison, reportedly raised the possibility of removing several well-known CNN anchors, including Erin Burnett and Brianna Keilar—both of whom have been publicly criticized by Trump in the past.
One White House official said the president believes CNN’s current leadership is openly hostile toward him and that he favors new ownership that would bring major programming changes.
The Ellisons have also been working to build trust with Trump while the U.S. Department of Justice reviews the competing deals.
The Antitrust Division—ultimately overseen by the president—will decide whether either merger can proceed. Recently, Larry and David Ellison were spotted with Trump in the presidential box during the Kennedy Center Honors, just two days before Paramount revealed its counteroffer.
Reports also indicate that Larry Ellison personally called Trump following the Netflix-Warner announcement, warning that a Netflix takeover could give Silicon Valley enormous influence over the streaming industry and reduce competition.
David Ellison has publicly outlined a broader vision for merging CNN with CBS News into a unified news operation. In a CNBC interview, he said the goal would be to create a larger news platform focused on “trust” and “truth,” aimed at appealing to what he describes as the political middle of the American public.
Under the proposed plan, the combined CNN–CBS News organization could be overseen by journalist Bari Weiss, who recently assumed leadership at CBS News. Weiss has promoted a shift toward what some observers call a more “post-woke” editorial approach.
One of her early hires was veteran reporter Matt Gutman, formerly with ABC News, who now serves as CBS’s chief correspondent across multiple programs including CBS Mornings and CBS Evening News.
Gutman recently drew criticism after comments made while reporting on the fatal shooting of conservative commentator Charlie Kirk.
During a broadcast, he described text messages between the suspect and a partner as “touching” and “intimate,” remarks some viewers felt were inappropriate given the seriousness of the incident. Within a day, Gutman publicly apologized, saying he regretted the wording and condemning the violence.
If the Ellison acquisition succeeds, CNN could be restructured along similar editorial lines as CBS News, reflecting what David Ellison calls a renewed focus on restoring viewer confidence.
Despite occasional frustration, advisers say Trump remains open to the Paramount proposal, partly because it includes CNN while the Netflix deal does not. Privately, he has said he wants significant reforms at the network.
Speaking at a White House roundtable, Trump commented that he is familiar with the companies involved but emphasized the need to review their market share before supporting any deal.
Meanwhile, the competing megamergers have sparked concern across the political spectrum
. Senator Elizabeth Warren warned that the deals could create serious monopoly risks, while Representative Darrell Issa argued that large media consolidations could reduce consumer choice and weaken independent voices.
As one political newsletter summarized, both Netflix and Paramount appear to believe that the ultimate fate of these massive media deals may depend on approval from the White House—making the Oval Office a central player in the battle for control of one of America’s most influential news networks.
Omg Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
The Epstein Unredacted: Congressman Dan Goldman Exposes Alleged DOJ Cover-Up and Explosive Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein’s Darkest Secrets
In a moment that has frozen the political landscape of Washington D.C., Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) took to the floor of the House of Representatives to deliver a presentation that may well become a pivot point in American history.
Holding a series of unredacted documents—files that the Department of Justice had previously fought to keep shielded from public view—Goldman laid out a systematic and devastating case against the official narrative surrounding Donald Trump’s involvement with the notorious financier Jeffrey Epstein.
His words were not merely an accusation; they were a calculated strike against what he described as a “massive cover-up” designed to protect the former president from the consequences of a decades-long association that was far more intimate and darker than previously admitted.
The core of Goldman’s address focused on a specific, harrowing allegation from an unnamed victim—a testimony that the FBI reportedly found “unquestionably credible.”
According to the unredacted files, this victim, who was between the ages of 13 and 15 at the time, provided a consistent and graphic account of an assault by Donald Trump.
The details disclosed by Goldman were visceral, describing a scene where the victim was left alone with Trump, who allegedly made predatory remarks about “teaching little girls how to be” before the situation turned violent. Goldman revealed that the victim’s account was so compelling that she bit Trump in self-defense, an act of resistance that led to her being cast out of the room with derogatory insults.
What makes this testimony particularly explosive is not just the nature of the allegation, but the fact that it was included in a 21-page PowerPoint presentation created by the FBI for federal prosecutors. Goldman argued that the FBI would never have included such testimony in a briefing for prosecutors if they did not believe the evidence was solid.
This leads to the most serious charge of the day: that Attorney General Pam Bondi lied under oath when she told the House Judiciary Committee that “there is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime” in relation to the Epstein files.
Goldman’s presentation systematically dismantled the “total stranger” or “casual acquaintance” defense that has been the hallmark of Trump’s public statements regarding Epstein for twenty-five years.
He pointed to a 2003 birthday card Trump sent to Epstein for his 50th birthday, in which Trump wrote that they had “certain things in common” and referred to Epstein as a “pal,” concluding with the cryptic wish: “may every day be another wonderful secret”. This personal correspondence stands in stark contrast to later claims of distance.
Even more revealing was the account of a phone call Trump allegedly made to the Palm Beach County police chief in 2006, immediately after the investigation into Epstein became public. According to the documents, Trump told the chief, “Thank goodness you’re stopping him—everyone has known he’s been doing this”. Goldman paused to highlight the logical inconsistency: why would an innocent person call a police chief to validate an investigation they supposedly knew nothing about? This “barking dog” evidence, as referenced in an email from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, suggests that Trump’s silence during the investigation was a calculated move to avoid being dragged into the spotlight alongside his “pal”.
The Congressman emphasized that the public is only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Out of the millions of documents generated by the Epstein investigation, the DOJ is still refusing to turn over nearly three million pages to Congress. Goldman questioned why the Attorney General is redacting information
from the public that she is then forced to show to Congress under pressure, and what remains hidden in the millions of pages still behind closed doors.
“If the Attorney General is covering up this information… what else is she covering up about Donald Trump’s involvement?” Goldman asked the chamber, leaving the question hanging over a stunned audience.
This article aims to provide a clear, journalistic overview of the facts as presented by Congressman Goldman. It is a story about the struggle for transparency, the integrity of the Department of Justice, and the long-overdue voices of victims who have waited decades for the truth to be unredacted. As the “Epstein Files Transparency Act” continues to force more documents into the light, the narrative of “wonderful secrets” is being replaced by a ledger of undeniable evidence.
The implications for the American judicial system are profound. If Goldman’s assertions hold true, it indicates a failure of the DOJ to remain impartial and a disturbing willingness to redact the truth in favor of political protection. The “dog that hasn’t barked” has finally started to make noise, and the sound is echoing through the halls of power, demanding an answer that redaction pens can no longer erase.
The public’s right to know has never been more vital. These unredacted files dispute everything previously said about the Trump-Epstein connection, transforming rumors into documented evidence. From the flights on the “Lolita Express”—which Goldman noted Trump took eight times despite his denials—to the hours spent at Epstein’s residences, the map of their shared world is being redrawn with forensic precision. This is not just about the past; it is about the accountability of the present and the future of justice in the United States.
