Report Claims George Soros’ Network Is Funding ‘No Kings’ Protests
Report Raises Questions About Funding Behind “No Kings” Protests
A new report has drawn attention to the possible financial backing behind the upcoming “No Kings” protests, a series of demonstrations planned to take place in Washington, D.C. and other cities across the United States.
According to publicly available grant records and archived filings, organizations connected to billionaire investor George Soros may have provided financial support to groups involved in organizing the events.
The protests are expected to attract tens of thousands of participants and are anticipated to be joined by Chuck Schumer, the Senate Minority Leader. Organizers say the demonstrations aim to bring attention to concerns about political power, democracy, and public accountability.
However, critics have raised questions about the network of organizations supporting the protests and the sources of their funding.
Soros and the Open Society Network
George Soros, one of the world’s most well-known investors and philanthropists, is the founder of the Open Society Foundations, a global philanthropic network that funds civil society groups, educational programs, and democratic initiatives in more than 100 countries.
Over the years, the organization reports distributing more than $32 billion to support projects aimed at strengthening democratic institutions, human rights, and civic participation.
Within this network is the Open Society Action Fund, which focuses on advocacy and public policy initiatives in the United States.
According to public filings, the fund awarded a two-year grant worth $3 million in 2023 to the progressive advocacy group Indivisible. The grant’s stated purpose was to support the organization’s “social welfare activities.”
Indivisible has emerged as one of the groups coordinating communication and participant data for the upcoming “No Kings” protests. The organization has a national network of local chapters that mobilize activists around issues such as voting rights, healthcare policy, and government accountability.
Leadership and Organizational Links
Indivisible is currently led by executive co-directors Ezra Levin and Leah Greenberg, who co-founded the organization following the 2016 U.S. election. Greenberg previously worked as policy director for former Virginia gubernatorial candidate Tom Perriello.
Perriello later served as executive director of the Open Society Foundations between 2018 and 2023, a connection that critics say reflects overlapping relationships between activist groups and philanthropic networks. Supporters, however, argue that such relationships are common in nonprofit advocacy work.
Additional Funding Networks
Financial records also show that in 2017 Indivisible received $350,000 from Tides Advocacy, part of the Tides Network, a philanthropic organization that distributes funds to progressive causes.
Another affiliate, the Tides Foundation, has faced criticism from some political commentators over grants provided to activist groups involved in controversial demonstrations.
Since Indivisible’s founding in 2017, reports indicate that organizations linked to Soros’ philanthropic network have collectively contributed more than $7.6 million to the group. However, the most recent annual grant report for 2024 has not yet been released by the Internal Revenue Service or by Open Society Foundations.
Responses From Open Society Foundations
A spokesperson for the Open Society Foundations responded to the criticism by emphasizing that all grants issued by the organization comply with U.S. law and that recipient groups maintain full independence in how they carry out their work.
According to the statement, the foundation supports organizations that encourage civic engagement and peaceful democratic participation.
“We support a wide range of independent organizations that work to deepen civic engagement through peaceful democratic participation, a hallmark of any vibrant society and a right protected by the Constitution,” the spokesperson said.
The foundation also clarified that it does not pay or train protesters and opposes all forms of violence.
Political Reactions
The funding connections have drawn attention from several Republican lawmakers. Ted Cruz, a U.S. senator from Texas, raised the issue during an interview with Sean Hannity on Fox News.
Cruz argued that financial networks connected to Soros could be supporting the demonstrations and warned that some protests across the country have previously escalated into unrest.
Cruz pointed to legislation he introduced called the STOP FUNDERs Act, which stands for “Financial Underwriting of Nefarious Demonstrations and Extremist Riots.”
The proposed bill would allow the United States Department of Justice to use Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act statutes to prosecute individuals or groups accused of funding violent protests.
Similarly, Representative Buddy Carter of Georgia sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi requesting an investigation into organizations connected to Soros’ philanthropic network. Carter argued that any funding tied to groups that encourage or enable political violence should be examined closely.
Organizers Emphasize Peaceful Demonstrations
Despite the criticism, organizers of the “No Kings” protests maintain that their goal is peaceful civic engagement. Guides published by Indivisible instruct participants to demonstrate responsibly and emphasize the importance of using constitutionally protected rights to assembly and free speech.
“Protests are most effective when we peacefully use our constitutionally protected rights of assembly and speech and properly prepare ahead of time,” the organization states in its protest guide.
Ongoing Debate Over Political Influence
The controversy surrounding the protests highlights a broader political debate in the United States about the influence of large donors, nonprofit networks, and advocacy organizations on public movements.
Supporters of Soros’ philanthropy argue that funding civic organizations strengthens democratic participation. Critics, however, believe that wealthy donors can exert disproportionate influence on political activism and public discourse.
As the nationwide demonstrations approach, attention is likely to remain focused on the funding structures behind activist movements and the role philanthropic networks play in shaping political engagement.
Whether viewed as legitimate civic activism or as evidence of organized political influence, the discussion surrounding the “No Kings” protests reflects the continuing tensions within the American political landscape.
My Sister Hit My 6-Month-Old Baby at Christmas Dinner—Then My Husband Stood Up and Said 2 Words
My Sister Hit My 6-Month-Old Baby at Christmas Dinner—Then My Husband Stood Up and Said 2 Words
The entire table went silent.
My mother looked down.
My father said nothing.
No one moved.
Except my husband.
He rose from his chair slowly, calm and completely in control, looked my sister straight in the eyes, and told her to leave.
She never came back after that night.
Christmas dinner at my parents’ house had always been loud, crowded, and slightly exhausting.
But that year felt different from the moment we arrived.
My husband, Captain James Walker, had only recently returned from a long deployment.
Our daughter, Emma, was six months old.
She wore a tiny red Christmas onesie with little reindeer stitched across the front.
It was her very first Christmas.
For us, that alone made the night special.
Then my sister Lauren showed up.
Late, as usual.
She walked through the door carrying a bottle of wine in one hand and a list of complaints in the other.
She barely looked at Emma.
Dinner was already halfway over when Emma started getting fussy.
Nothing unusual.
She was tired, overwhelmed by the noise, and surrounded by people she barely knew.
I stood beside the table, lifted her into my arms, and gently rocked her against my chest.
Lauren immediately rolled her eyes.
“She’s already spoiled,” she said.
“You pick her up every single time she makes a sound.”
I looked at her.
“She’s six months old, Lauren.”
Lauren pushed back her chair and stood.
“Give her to me.”
Before I could answer, she reached for Emma.
I hesitated.
But Lauren had already put her hands out.
The moment Emma felt herself being pulled away from me, she squirmed.
Then she started crying harder.
Lauren’s face tightened.
And before I fully understood what she was doing—
she slapped my baby.
It wasn’t hard enough to leave a visible mark.
But it was hard enough.
Hard enough to make Emma scream.
Hard enough to make every person at that table freeze.
Hard enough to make something inside me snap.
“What did you just do?”
My voice came out louder than I intended.
Lauren stared at me like I was the one behaving badly.
Then she gave a careless little scoff.
“Oh, relax.”
“It was a tap.”
“You’re overreacting.”
I immediately pulled Emma back against my chest.
She was crying so hard she could barely catch her breath.
My hands started shaking as I held her.
My heart pounded against my ribs.
I looked around the table, waiting for someone—anyone—to say something.
My mother stared down at her plate.
My father cleared his throat but never looked at Lauren.
My uncle shifted uncomfortably in his chair.
No one defended Emma.
No one confronted Lauren.
Nothing.
“That was my child,” I said, fighting to keep my voice steady.
“You just hit my baby.”
Lauren folded her arms.
“Oh my God, you’re so dramatic.”
Then she actually laughed.
“Children need discipline.”
I stared at her in disbelief.
“Discipline?”
“She’s six months old.”
Lauren shrugged.
“Then maybe she should learn early.”
Still, nobody at the table said a word.
The silence hurt almost as much as what Lauren had done.
And then—
a chair scraped sharply across the floor.
Everyone turned.
James stood up.
He didn’t slam his hands on the table.
He didn’t shout.
He didn’t curse.
He simply rose to his full height and looked directly at Lauren.
His posture was straight.
His expression was unreadable.
I had seen that look before.
At military ceremonies.
During difficult phone calls.
In moments when everyone around him understood that the conversation was over before he even raised his voice.
“Get out,” James said.
Lauren blinked.
Then she gave a nervous laugh.
“Excuse me?”
James didn’t move.
“You struck my child.”
His voice remained quiet.
Controlled.
“You will leave this house.”
“Now.”
Lauren looked around the table, clearly expecting someone to jump in and defend her.
Nobody did.
Her smile disappeared.
“You’re seriously kicking me out over that?”
James held her gaze.
“I’m telling you to leave because you put your hands on my six-month-old daughter and then laughed about it.”
Lauren’s face reddened.
“This isn’t even your house.”
James took one slow step forward.
“No.”
“It isn’t.”
Then his eyes briefly moved across the silent faces around the table before returning to hers.
“But that is my daughter.”
“And you will never touch her again.”
Lauren opened her mouth to argue.
James didn’t give her the chance.
“If you don’t leave immediately,” he said calmly, “I will…”
READ THE REST OF THE STORY IN THE COMMENT ⬇️
