"Iranian President Sets Three Key Conditions to End Conflict With the U.S. and Israel"
Iranian President Sets Three Conditions to End Conflict With the U.S. and Israel
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian has laid out three major conditions for ending the escalating conflict with the United States and Israel, demanding compensation and strong international guarantees that Iran will not be attacked again in the future.
In a post on the social platform X on March 12, Pezeshkian said he had spoken with leaders from Russia and Pakistan, reaffirming Iran’s stated commitment to stability and peace in the Middle East despite the rapidly escalating tensions.
According to Pezeshkian, the current conflict—triggered by military actions from the United States and Israel—can only end if three key demands are met. First, Iran insists that its “legitimate rights” be formally recognized by the international community. Second, Tehran demands compensation for damages caused by the military strikes. Third, Iran wants binding international guarantees to prevent any future attacks against its territory.
“The only way to end the current conflict initiated by the United States and Israel is to recognize Iran’s legitimate rights, compensate for the damages, and provide firm international guarantees to prevent aggression against us in the future,” Pezeshkian wrote.
This marks the first time the Iranian president has publicly outlined specific conditions to end the war, which has now stretched into nearly two weeks of intense hostilities between Iran and the U.S.-Israel alliance.
At the same time, tensions continued to rise across the region. Iran’s parliamentary speaker, Bagher Ghalibaf, warned that Tehran would abandon “all restraint” if the United States or Israel attempted to attack any Iranian islands in the Persian Gulf—including the strategic oil hub of Kharg Island.
According to reports from Axios, U.S. officials have been discussing possible military options targeting Kharg Island, widely considered the lifeline of Iran’s oil exports. Any attempt to seize or disable the island could significantly disrupt Iran’s economy and global oil markets.
Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald Trump suggested the conflict may be nearing its final stage. “It’s pretty close to the end,” Trump said in a recent statement. “That doesn’t mean we stop immediately—but Iran will.”
However, some analysts believe the situation could escalate even further. Strategic expert Pierre Razoux from the Mediterranean Foundation for Strategic Studies warned that assuming the conflict can end simply through political declaration could be a major miscalculation.
“If Washington believes the war ends when President Trump says it does, it will be ignoring the lessons of history,” Razoux said. “Iran could launch a prolonged war of attrition against U.S. and Israeli interests.”
The region has been engulfed in violence since February 28, when the United States and Israel launched a large-scale air campaign against Iranian targets. In response, Iran fired ballistic missiles and deployed drones toward Israeli territory and U.S. military bases located across several Arab countries in the region.
Iran has also targeted strategic infrastructure across the Gulf, including oil facilities and commercial vessels navigating through the vital Strait of Hormuz—one of the world’s most important energy shipping routes.
The conflict has already caused significant casualties. Reports indicate that nearly 2,000 people have been killed, the majority in Iran, while the broader fighting has disrupted regional stability and sent shockwaves through global energy markets.
On March 11, Iran’s military escalated its warnings, declaring it would begin targeting economic interests linked to the United States and Israel across the region. Officials said the decision came in retaliation for a deadly strike on an Iranian bank branch.
Iranian media outlet Tasnim News Agency later published a list of potential targets that included offices and facilities belonging to major tech companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Nvidia located in Israel and several Gulf countries.
The threat may already be materializing. Last week, two data centers operated by Amazon in the United Arab Emirates were reportedly struck by drones, briefly disrupting digital services in parts of the Middle East.
As military strikes, economic threats, and political warnings continue to intensify, analysts warn that the conflict risks spreading far beyond the battlefield—potentially impacting global trade, energy supplies, and international security.
Omg Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
The Epstein Unredacted: Congressman Dan Goldman Exposes Alleged DOJ Cover-Up and Explosive Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein’s Darkest Secrets
In a moment that has frozen the political landscape of Washington D.C., Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) took to the floor of the House of Representatives to deliver a presentation that may well become a pivot point in American history.
Holding a series of unredacted documents—files that the Department of Justice had previously fought to keep shielded from public view—Goldman laid out a systematic and devastating case against the official narrative surrounding Donald Trump’s involvement with the notorious financier Jeffrey Epstein.
His words were not merely an accusation; they were a calculated strike against what he described as a “massive cover-up” designed to protect the former president from the consequences of a decades-long association that was far more intimate and darker than previously admitted.
The core of Goldman’s address focused on a specific, harrowing allegation from an unnamed victim—a testimony that the FBI reportedly found “unquestionably credible.”
According to the unredacted files, this victim, who was between the ages of 13 and 15 at the time, provided a consistent and graphic account of an assault by Donald Trump.
The details disclosed by Goldman were visceral, describing a scene where the victim was left alone with Trump, who allegedly made predatory remarks about “teaching little girls how to be” before the situation turned violent. Goldman revealed that the victim’s account was so compelling that she bit Trump in self-defense, an act of resistance that led to her being cast out of the room with derogatory insults.
What makes this testimony particularly explosive is not just the nature of the allegation, but the fact that it was included in a 21-page PowerPoint presentation created by the FBI for federal prosecutors. Goldman argued that the FBI would never have included such testimony in a briefing for prosecutors if they did not believe the evidence was solid.
This leads to the most serious charge of the day: that Attorney General Pam Bondi lied under oath when she told the House Judiciary Committee that “there is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime” in relation to the Epstein files.
Goldman’s presentation systematically dismantled the “total stranger” or “casual acquaintance” defense that has been the hallmark of Trump’s public statements regarding Epstein for twenty-five years.
He pointed to a 2003 birthday card Trump sent to Epstein for his 50th birthday, in which Trump wrote that they had “certain things in common” and referred to Epstein as a “pal,” concluding with the cryptic wish: “may every day be another wonderful secret”. This personal correspondence stands in stark contrast to later claims of distance.
Even more revealing was the account of a phone call Trump allegedly made to the Palm Beach County police chief in 2006, immediately after the investigation into Epstein became public. According to the documents, Trump told the chief, “Thank goodness you’re stopping him—everyone has known he’s been doing this”. Goldman paused to highlight the logical inconsistency: why would an innocent person call a police chief to validate an investigation they supposedly knew nothing about? This “barking dog” evidence, as referenced in an email from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, suggests that Trump’s silence during the investigation was a calculated move to avoid being dragged into the spotlight alongside his “pal”.
The Congressman emphasized that the public is only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Out of the millions of documents generated by the Epstein investigation, the DOJ is still refusing to turn over nearly three million pages to Congress. Goldman questioned why the Attorney General is redacting information
from the public that she is then forced to show to Congress under pressure, and what remains hidden in the millions of pages still behind closed doors.
“If the Attorney General is covering up this information… what else is she covering up about Donald Trump’s involvement?” Goldman asked the chamber, leaving the question hanging over a stunned audience.
This article aims to provide a clear, journalistic overview of the facts as presented by Congressman Goldman. It is a story about the struggle for transparency, the integrity of the Department of Justice, and the long-overdue voices of victims who have waited decades for the truth to be unredacted. As the “Epstein Files Transparency Act” continues to force more documents into the light, the narrative of “wonderful secrets” is being replaced by a ledger of undeniable evidence.
The implications for the American judicial system are profound. If Goldman’s assertions hold true, it indicates a failure of the DOJ to remain impartial and a disturbing willingness to redact the truth in favor of political protection. The “dog that hasn’t barked” has finally started to make noise, and the sound is echoing through the halls of power, demanding an answer that redaction pens can no longer erase.
The public’s right to know has never been more vital. These unredacted files dispute everything previously said about the Trump-Epstein connection, transforming rumors into documented evidence. From the flights on the “Lolita Express”—which Goldman noted Trump took eight times despite his denials—to the hours spent at Epstein’s residences, the map of their shared world is being redrawn with forensic precision. This is not just about the past; it is about the accountability of the present and the future of justice in the United States.
