Democrats Push Back on Trump’s Claim Iran Possesses Tomahawk Missiles 📲🔥
Senate Democratic Leader Blasts Trump’s ‘Iran Tomahawk’ Claim, Demands Probe Into Deadly School Strike
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer sharply rejected claims by Donald Trump that Iran could have been responsible for a deadly missile strike on a girls’ school using a Tomahawk missile, calling the statement “absurd” and demanding an independent investigation.
Speaking on March 11, Schumer criticized Trump for suggesting that Tehran might possess Tomahawk missile and could have used it in the attack.
“Donald Trump said Iran’s Tomahawk missile carried out the strike on a girls’ school that killed 170 people, many of them children,” Schumer said. “Iran doesn’t have Tomahawk missiles, Donald Trump. That claim is ridiculous.”
The attack devastated the Shajarah Tayyebeh Girls’ Elementary School in Hormozgan province on February 28, the same day the United States and Israel launched airstrikes against Iran. The missile strike destroyed the school and killed at least 175 people, most of them students.
Iran quickly blamed the United States, displaying missile fragments recovered from the scene.
One piece reportedly carried the marking “SDL ANTENNA,” a component linked to satellite data communication systems used in the latest Tomahawk missile variants. Identification numbers on the fragment allegedly show the part was supplied to the U.S. military under a 2014 procurement order.
Another fragment displayed by Iranian state media bore the label “Globe Motors – Made in the USA.”
Despite the evidence presented by Tehran, Trump said on March 9 that Iran “also has some Tomahawks” and suggested the possibility that Iranian forces might have been responsible for the strike. However, he did not provide any proof.
Military analysts note that Tomahawk cruise missiles are sold only to a small group of close U.S. allies, including Japan, Australia, United Kingdom, and Netherlands. Public defense records show that neither Iran nor Israel is known to possess the weapon.
Schumer accused Trump of making reckless statements without regard for facts.
“Once again, he says whatever comes to mind, no matter what the truth is,” Schumer said. “We’re used to the lies, but when it comes to something this serious, it’s horrifying. Not a single other official in the administration — not even Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth — has made this claim.”
The Senate Democrat is now demanding a full, independent, and transparent investigation into the school strike to determine exactly what happened and why so many civilians lost their lives.
Schumer also warned that Trump’s approach toward Iran could have serious economic consequences. He pointed to Iran’s move to block the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil route, which has already triggered sharp increases in oil and gas prices worldwide.
“Trump just says, ‘If prices go up, they go up — it doesn’t really affect us,’” Schumer said. “Maybe billionaires like him don’t have to worry about it. But for the rest of Americans, this conflict with Iran could mean rising inflation.”
Schumer further called on Trump, Defense Secretary Hegseth, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to testify publicly before Congress and explain why U.S. forces are once again fighting and dying in the Middle East.
So far, Trump and senior administration officials have not responded directly to Schumer’s remarks. The president has stated that the United States “has won” in Iran, but acknowledged that “there is still more work to be done.”
The 12-day conflict has already taken a heavy toll. Nearly 2,000 people have died, including more than 1,300 in Iran and over 600 in Lebanon. On the U.S. side, eight American soldiers were killed and about 140 wounded, with eight suffering critical injuries.
With tensions still high, the tragedy has sparked a growing global question: Who was truly responsible for the deadly strike — and what happens next? 🚨
Omg Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
Uncovered Goldman Sachs File Sparks New Questions About Trump’s Epstein Connections
The Epstein Unredacted: Congressman Dan Goldman Exposes Alleged DOJ Cover-Up and Explosive Evidence Linking Trump to Epstein’s Darkest Secrets
In a moment that has frozen the political landscape of Washington D.C., Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) took to the floor of the House of Representatives to deliver a presentation that may well become a pivot point in American history.
Holding a series of unredacted documents—files that the Department of Justice had previously fought to keep shielded from public view—Goldman laid out a systematic and devastating case against the official narrative surrounding Donald Trump’s involvement with the notorious financier Jeffrey Epstein.
His words were not merely an accusation; they were a calculated strike against what he described as a “massive cover-up” designed to protect the former president from the consequences of a decades-long association that was far more intimate and darker than previously admitted.
The core of Goldman’s address focused on a specific, harrowing allegation from an unnamed victim—a testimony that the FBI reportedly found “unquestionably credible.”
According to the unredacted files, this victim, who was between the ages of 13 and 15 at the time, provided a consistent and graphic account of an assault by Donald Trump.
The details disclosed by Goldman were visceral, describing a scene where the victim was left alone with Trump, who allegedly made predatory remarks about “teaching little girls how to be” before the situation turned violent. Goldman revealed that the victim’s account was so compelling that she bit Trump in self-defense, an act of resistance that led to her being cast out of the room with derogatory insults.
What makes this testimony particularly explosive is not just the nature of the allegation, but the fact that it was included in a 21-page PowerPoint presentation created by the FBI for federal prosecutors. Goldman argued that the FBI would never have included such testimony in a briefing for prosecutors if they did not believe the evidence was solid.
This leads to the most serious charge of the day: that Attorney General Pam Bondi lied under oath when she told the House Judiciary Committee that “there is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime” in relation to the Epstein files.
Goldman’s presentation systematically dismantled the “total stranger” or “casual acquaintance” defense that has been the hallmark of Trump’s public statements regarding Epstein for twenty-five years.
He pointed to a 2003 birthday card Trump sent to Epstein for his 50th birthday, in which Trump wrote that they had “certain things in common” and referred to Epstein as a “pal,” concluding with the cryptic wish: “may every day be another wonderful secret”. This personal correspondence stands in stark contrast to later claims of distance.
Even more revealing was the account of a phone call Trump allegedly made to the Palm Beach County police chief in 2006, immediately after the investigation into Epstein became public. According to the documents, Trump told the chief, “Thank goodness you’re stopping him—everyone has known he’s been doing this”. Goldman paused to highlight the logical inconsistency: why would an innocent person call a police chief to validate an investigation they supposedly knew nothing about? This “barking dog” evidence, as referenced in an email from Epstein to Ghislaine Maxwell, suggests that Trump’s silence during the investigation was a calculated move to avoid being dragged into the spotlight alongside his “pal”.
The Congressman emphasized that the public is only seeing the tip of the iceberg. Out of the millions of documents generated by the Epstein investigation, the DOJ is still refusing to turn over nearly three million pages to Congress. Goldman questioned why the Attorney General is redacting information
from the public that she is then forced to show to Congress under pressure, and what remains hidden in the millions of pages still behind closed doors.
“If the Attorney General is covering up this information… what else is she covering up about Donald Trump’s involvement?” Goldman asked the chamber, leaving the question hanging over a stunned audience.
This article aims to provide a clear, journalistic overview of the facts as presented by Congressman Goldman. It is a story about the struggle for transparency, the integrity of the Department of Justice, and the long-overdue voices of victims who have waited decades for the truth to be unredacted. As the “Epstein Files Transparency Act” continues to force more documents into the light, the narrative of “wonderful secrets” is being replaced by a ledger of undeniable evidence.
The implications for the American judicial system are profound. If Goldman’s assertions hold true, it indicates a failure of the DOJ to remain impartial and a disturbing willingness to redact the truth in favor of political protection. The “dog that hasn’t barked” has finally started to make noise, and the sound is echoing through the halls of power, demanding an answer that redaction pens can no longer erase.
The public’s right to know has never been more vital. These unredacted files dispute everything previously said about the Trump-Epstein connection, transforming rumors into documented evidence. From the flights on the “Lolita Express”—which Goldman noted Trump took eight times despite his denials—to the hours spent at Epstein’s residences, the map of their shared world is being redrawn with forensic precision. This is not just about the past; it is about the accountability of the present and the future of justice in the United States.
